The Status Quo of Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: Reinterpreting Friedman’s Legal System Theory in the Era of the New Criminal Code

Authors

  • Taufik Tri Prabowo Universitas Borobudur
  • Marnija Universitas Borobudur
  • Raden Ferdiandra Defry Yusdanial Universitas Borobudur
  • Hans Karyose Universitas Borobudur
  • Muhammad Anshari Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66111/j8nmvj63

Keywords:

corruption eradication, legal system, Lawrence M. Friedman, legal culture, lex specialis, Indonesia

Abstract

Corruption remains one of the most persistent structural challenges in Indonesian governance. Despite a relatively dense anti-corruption legal architecture, the Indonesian anti-corruption regime has not produced consistent and transformative results. This article examined the status quo of corruption eradication in Indonesia through Lawrence M. Friedman's legal system theory, focusing on the interaction among legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. Using normative juridical research supported by conceptual, statutory, and systems-oriented analysis, the study assessed the implications of the recodification of corruption offences in Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, the fragmentation of institutional mandates among the Corruption Eradication Commission, the Attorney General's Office, and the National Police, and the persistence of permissive social attitudes toward corrupt practices. The findings showed that each component of Friedman's legal system exhibits a distinct dysfunction that reinforces the others, producing a feedback loop in which formal anti-corruption instruments fail to generate substantive change. The article concluded that sustainable corruption eradication requires simultaneous harmonisation of legal norms, coordinated institutional reform, and transformation of public integrity culture.

References

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (2023). KUHP baru posisikan delik korupsi bukan lagi extraordinary crime: Bagaimana nasib pemberantasan korupsi? https://bphn.go.id/publikasi/berita/2023031303314411/kuhp-baru-posisikan-delik-korupsi-bukan-lagi-extraordinary-crime-bagaimana-nasib-pemberantasan-korupsi

Cotterrell, R. (1992). The sociology of law: An introduction. Butterworths.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Hukumonline. (2025, January 14). Transparansi dan akuntabilitas kunci penegakan hukum di masa mendatang. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/transparansi-dan-akuntabilitas-kunci-penegakan-hukum-di-masa-mendatang-lt678698dcf04a5/

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024, December 30). Perkuat sinergi pemberantasan korupsi, KPK gelar audiensi bersama Polri dan Kejaksaan Agung. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/perkuat-sinergi-pemberantasan-korupsi-kpk-gelar-audiensi-bersama-polri-kejaksaan-agung-1

Kwon, J. (2023). Jurisdictional overlap: The juxtaposition of institutional independence and collaboration in police wrongdoing investigations. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12532

Man-wai, K., & Peh Yun-lu, S. (2011). Successful anti-corruption strategy and international good practices: The Hong Kong ICAC experience. UNAFEI Resource Material Series, 86, 81-94. https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No86/No86_16VE_Man-wai.pdf

Republic of Indonesia. (1999). Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes.

Republic of Indonesia. (2001). Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes.

Republic of Indonesia. (2002). Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission.

Republic of Indonesia. (2006). Law Number 7 of 2006 concerning Ratification of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003.

Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.

Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Presidential Regulation Number 122 of 2024 concerning the Indonesian National Police.

Siagian, F. S. (2023). Optimizing Lawrence Meir Friedman’s legal system theory in the authority to investigate corruption crimes in Indonesia. Justices: Journal of Law, 2(4), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i4.93

Suyanto, S., et al. (2023). Comparative analysis of corruption criminal regulations between the new criminal law and the Corruption Act. Awang Long Law Review, 5(2), 535-544. https://ejournal.stih-awanglong.ac.id/index.php/awl/article/view/753

Transparency International Indonesia. (2022). Kejahatan biasa bernama korupsi. https://ti.or.id/kejahatan-biasa-bernama-korupsi/

United Nations. (2004). United Nations Convention against Corruption. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Holistic integrity frameworks to address corruption. UNODC/UN-PRAC. https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/archive/documents/pacific/2021/UN-PRAC_Paper_-_Holistic_Integrity_Frameworks_to_Address_Corruption.pdf

Zuliah, A., & Amalia, F. (2025). Penerapan adagium lex specialis derogat legi generalis dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan, 5(2), 1-15. https://jurnal.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/law_jurnal/article/view/6079

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Status Quo of Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: Reinterpreting Friedman’s Legal System Theory in the Era of the New Criminal Code. (2026). Journal of Law, Society and Living Norms, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.66111/j8nmvj63